Methods and compositions for selecting corn plants resistant to diplodia ear rot

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to the field of plant breeding and disease resistance. More specifically, the invention includes a method for breeding corn plants containing quantitative trait loci that are associated with diplodia ear rot (DER), a fungal disease associated with  Stenocarpella  spp. The invention further includes germplasm and the use of germplasm containing quantitative trait loci (QTL) conferring resistance for introgression into elite germplasm in a breeding program for resistance to DER.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.13/524,716, filed Jun. 15, 2012 which is a division of U.S. applicationSer. No. 12/277,817, filed Nov. 25, 2008, issued as U.S. Pat. No.8,222,481, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 60/990,413, filed Nov. 27, 2007, each of which areincorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

INCORPORATION OF SEQUENCE LISTING

A sequence listing is contained in the file named“46_(—)21_(—)55528C_Corrected.txt” which is 53687 bytes (measured inMS-Windows) and was created on Sep. 19, 2012, comprises 79 nucleotidesequences, and is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of plant breeding and diseaseresistance. More specifically, the present invention includes a methodfor breeding corn plants containing quantitative trait loci (QTL) thatare associated with resistance to diplodia ear rot, a fungal diseaseassociated with Stenocarpella maydis and Stenocarpella macrospora. Theinvention further includes germplasm and the use of germplasm containingQTL conferring disease resistance for introgression into elite germplasmin a breeding program for resistance to diplodia ear rot.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

Diplodia ear rot (DER) is a widespread fungal disease of corn caused bythe pathogens Stenocarpella maydis and Stenocarpella macrospora. DERcauses significant damage to crops with loss of yield and decrease ingrain quality. In addition, when present in animal feed S. maydis hasbeen associated with diplodiosis, a nervous disorder of livestock. DERhas been problematic in many countries including the United States,South Africa, Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico. In South Africa, S. maydisis the most prevalent ear rot pathogen (Flett, B. B. and McLaren, N. W.;Plant Disease 78:587-589 (1994). Symptoms of DER include white fungalmycelium which starts at the base of an ear of corn and may cover theentire ear with pycnidia at the kernel base. Discoloration of kernels isanother symptom of DER which may not be evident until kernels areremoved from the ear. Symptoms are frequently not observable until theear is opened. Phenotypic screening for ear rot infection is oftendifficult due to the need to hand harvest ears. Disease managementstrategies include such methods as crop rotation and fungicideapplication. However, genetic resistance to DER is the most promisingmethod of controlling the disease. To date, a need exists in the art todevelop improved methods to identify and select for genomic regionsassociated with tolerance or resistance to DER in order to breed DERresistant plants.

Studies have mapped QTL associated with resistance to other ear rotpathogens such as Fusarium verticilliodes and Fusarium proliferatum, thecausative agents of Fusarium ear rot (Ali, M. L. et al., Genome 48:521-533 (2005)), Fusarium graminearum, the causative agent of Gibberellaear rot (Robertson-Hoyt, L., Crop Sci. 46:1734-1743 (2006)), andAspergillus flavus, the causative agent of Aspergillus ear rot (Busboom,K. N. and White, D. G., Amer. Phytopathological Soc. 94:1107-1115(2004)). QTL associated with resistance to diplodia ear rot have notbeen disclosed before the priority date of this patent application.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The present invention provides QTL and single nucleotide polymorphism(SNP) markers associated with resistance to DER.

Breeding for corn plants resistant to DER can be greatly facilitated bythe use of marker-assisted selection. Of the classes of genetic markers,single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have characteristics which makethem preferential to other genetic markers in detecting, selecting for,and introgressing disease resistance in a corn plant. SNPs are preferredbecause technologies are available for automated, high-throughputscreening of SNP markers, which can decrease the time to select for andintrogress disease resistance in corn plants. Further, SNP markers areideal because the likelihood that a particular SNP allele is derivedfrom independent origins in the extant population of a particularspecies is very low. As such, SNP markers are useful for tracking andassisting introgression of disease resistance alleles, particularly inthe case of disease resistance haplotypes.

The present invention provides and includes a method for screening andselecting a corn plant comprising one or more QTL associated with DERresistance that were derived from mapping populations that werephenotyped using endemic strains of Stenocarpella maydis andStenocarpella macrospora and genotyped using single nucleotidepolymorphisms (SNP) marker technology.

The present inventions provides a method of introgressing an allele intoa corn plant comprising (a) crossing at least one DER resistant cornplant with at least one second corn plant in order to form a population,(b) genotyping with at least one second corn plant in the populationwith respect to a corn genomic nucleic acid marker selected from thegroup of SEQ ID NOs: 1 through 47, and (c) selecting from the populationat least one corn plant comprising at least one genotype correspondingto a DER resistant corn plant. In certain embodiments of this method,the population formed, genotyped, and selected from can be a segregatingpopulation. The invention further provides an elite corn plant producedby such method.

The genotyping is effected in step (b) by determining the allelic stateof at least one of the corn genomic DNA markers. The allelic state isdetermined by an assay which is selected from the group consisting ofsingle base extension (SBE), allele-specific primer extension sequencing(ASPE), DNA sequencing, RNA sequencing, microarray-based analyses,universal PCR, allele specific extension, hybridization, massspectrometry, ligation, extension-ligation, and FlapEndonuclease-mediated assays.

The invention further provides a method of introgressing an allele intoa corn plant comprising: (a) crossing at least one DER resistant cornplant with at least one DER sensitive corn plant in order to form apopulation; (b) screening the population with at least one nucleic acidmarker to determine if one or more corn plants from the populationcontains a DER resistance allele, wherein the DER resistance allele isan allele selected from the group consisting of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, or 24 DERresistance loci. In certain embodiments of this method, the populationformed, genotyped, and selected from can be a segregating population.

The invention provides an elite corn plant obtained by such method, thecorn plant comprising a nucleic acid molecule selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1 through 47. The elite corn plant can exhibita transgenic trait. Such transgenic trait is selected from the groupconsisting of herbicide tolerance, modified yield, insect control,fungal disease resistance, virus resistance, nematode resistance,bacterial disease resistance, mycoplasma disease resistance, starchproduction, starch modification, high oil production, modified oilproduction, modified fatty acid content, high protein production,germination and seedling growth control, plant growth and development,fruit ripening, enhanced animal and human nutrition, low raffinose,environmental stress resistance, increased digestibility, industrialenzymes, pharmaceutical peptides and secretable peptides and smallmolecules, improved digestibility, enzyme production, fiber production,improved processing traits, improved flavor, nitrogen fixation, hybridseed production, reduced allergenicity, biopolymers, and biofuels amongothers. In one aspect, the herbicide tolerance is selected from thegroup consisting of glyphosate, dicamba, glufosinate, sulfonylurea,bromoxynil and norflurazon herbicides. These traits can be provided bymethods of plant biotechnology as transgenes in corn.

The invention provides a substantially purified nucleic acid moleculefor the detection of loci related to DER resistance comprising a nucleicacid molecule selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1through 79 and complements thereof.

The invention further provides assays for detecting DER resistance lociin a corn plant.

Methods of identifying corn plants comprising at least one alleleassociated with diplodia ear rot (DER) resistance are also provided. Incertain embodiments of these methods of identifying a corn plantcomprising at least one allele associated with diplodia ear rot (DER)resistance or with DER tolerance in a corn plant, the methods comprise:(a) genotyping at least one corn plant with at least one corn genomicnucleic acid marker selected from the group of SEQ ID NOs: 1-46, and 47,and (b) selecting at least one corn plant comprising an allele of atleast one of the nucleic acid markers that is associated with resistanceor tolerance to DER. In certain embodiments, the at least one corn plantgenotyped in step (a) and/or the at least one corn plant selected instep (b) is a corn plant from a population generated by a cross. Incertain embodiments, genotyping in step (b) can be with at least fivecorn genomic nucleic acid markers are selected from the group of SEQ IDNOs: 1 through 47. In certain embodiments, the selected one or more cornplants exhibit at least tolerance to a DER-inducing fungus or exhibit atleast resistance to a DER-inducing fungus. In embodiments where thepopulation is generated by a cross, the cross can be of at least one DERresistant corn plant with at least one DER sensitive corn plant. Instill other embodiments, the methods can further comprise the step (c)of assaying the selected corn plant for resistance to a DER-inducingfungus. In still other embodiments, the methods can further comprise thestep of crossing the corn plant selected in step (b) to another cornplant. In still other embodiments, the methods can further comprise thestep of obtaining seed from the corn plant selected in step (b). Incertain embodiments of the methods, resistance or tolerance is to aDER-inducing fungus selected from the group consisting of Stenocarpellamaydis and Stenocarpella macrospora.

Also provided herein are corn plants obtained by any of these methods ofidentifying corn plants comprising at least one allele associated withdiplodia ear rot (DER) resistance. In certain embodiments, corn plantsobtained by these methods can comprise an allele of at least one nucleicacid molecule selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1through 47 that is associated with resistance or tolerance to DER, andwherein the corn plant exhibits at least tolerance to a DER-inducingfungus or at least resistance to a DER-inducing fungus. In certainembodiments, corn plants obtained by these methods are elite cornplants.

Methods of introgressing a diplodia ear rot (DER) resistance locus intoa corn plant are also provided. In certain embodiments, these methods ofintrogressing a diplodia ear rot (DER) resistance locus into a cornplant comprise: (a) screening a population with at least one nucleicacid marker to determine if one or more corn plants from the populationcontains a diplodia ear rot (DER) resistance locus, wherein the DERresistance locus is selected from the group consisting of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, or24 DER resistant loci, and (b) selecting from the population at leastone corn plant comprising an allele of the marker associated with theDER resistance locus. In certain embodiments of these methods, at leastone of the markers is as provided in FIG. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or Table 4.In certain embodiments of these methods, at least one of the markers islocated within 5 cM, 2 cM, or 1 cM of the resistant allele. In otherembodiments, at least one of the markers is located within 2 cM, or 1 cMof the resistant allele. In certain embodiments of these methods, atleast one of the markers is located within 100 Kb of the resistanceallele. In other embodiments, at least one of the markers is locatedwithin 1 Mb, or 1 Kb of the resistant allele. In certain embodiments ofthese methods, the population is a segregating population. In certainembodiments of these methods, at least one of the markers exhibits a LODscore of greater than 2.0 with the DER resistance locus. In otherembodiments, at least one of the markers exhibits a LOD score of greaterthan 3.0 or greater than 4.0 with the DER resistance locus. In certainembodiments of these methods, at least one of the markers is selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1-46, and 47.

Also provided herein are corn plants obtained by any of these methods ofintrogressing a diplodia ear rot (DER) resistance locus into a cornplant. In certain embodiments, a corn plant obtained by these methodscan comprise an allele of at least one of nucleic acid marker selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1-46, and 47 that is associatedwith resistance to DER or with tolerance to DER. In certain embodiments,a corn plant obtained by these methods can exhibit at least tolerance toa DER-inducing fungus. In certain embodiments, a corn plant obtained bythese methods can exhibit at least resistance to a DER-inducing fungus.In certain embodiments, corn plants obtained by these methods are atleast tolerant or at least resistant to a DER-inducing fungus isselected from the group consisting of Stenocarpella macrospora andStenocapella maydis.

Also provided are isolated nucleic acid molecules for detecting amolecular marker representing a polymorphism in corn DNA, wherein thenucleic acid molecule comprises at least 15 nucleotides that include orare adjacent to the polymorphism, wherein the nucleic acid molecule isat least 90 percent identical to a sequence of the same number ofconsecutive nucleotides in either strand of DNA that include or areadjacent to the polymorphism, and wherein the molecular marker isselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1 through 47. Incertain embodiments, the nucleic acid can further comprises a detectablelabel or provide for incorporation of a detectable label. In certainembodiments, the nucleic acid molecule hybridizes to at least one alleleof the molecular marker under stringent hybridization conditions. Incertain embodiments, the molecular marker is SEQ ID NO: 27 and theisolated nucleic acid is an oligonucleotide that is at least 90%identical to SEQ ID NOs: 56, 57, 64, 65, 72, or 73. In certainembodiments, the molecular marker is SEQ ID NO: 28 and the nucleic acidis an oligonucleotide that is at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 58,59, 66, 67, 74, or 75. In certain embodiments, the molecular marker isSEQ ID NO: 5 and the nucleic acid is an oligonucleotide that is at least90% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 60, 61, 68, 69, 76, or 77. In certainembodiments, the molecular marker is SEQ ID NO: 6 and the nucleic acidis an oligonucleotide that is at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 62,63, 70, 71, 78, or 79.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCES

SEQ ID NO: 1 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 1.

SEQ ID NO: 2 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 1.

SEQ ID NO: 3 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 2.

SEQ ID NO: 4 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 2.

SEQ ID NO: 5 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 3.

SEQ ID NO: 6 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 3.

SEQ ID NO: 7 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 4.

SEQ ID NO: 8 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 5.

SEQ ID NO: 9 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 4.

SEQ ID NO: 10 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 5.

SEQ ID NO: 11 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 6.

SEQ ID NO: 12 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 6.

SEQ ID NO: 13 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 7.

SEQ ID NO: 14 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 7.

SEQ ID NO: 15 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 8.

SEQ ID NO: 16 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 8.

SEQ ID NO: 17 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 9.

SEQ ID NO: 18 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 10.

SEQ ID NO: 19 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 9.

SEQ ID NO: 20 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 10.

SEQ ID NO: 21 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 11.

SEQ ID NO: 22 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 12.

SEQ ID NO: 23 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 11.

SEQ ID NO: 24 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 12.

SEQ ID NO: 25 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 13.

SEQ ID NO: 26 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 13.

SEQ ID NO: 27 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 14.

SEQ ID NO: 28 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 14.

SEQ ID NO: 29 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 15.

SEQ ID NO: 30 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 16.

SEQ ID NO: 31 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 15.

SEQ ID NO: 32 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 16.

SEQ ID NO: 33 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 17.

SEQ ID NO: 34 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 17.

SEQ ID NO: 35 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 18.

SEQ ID NO: 36 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 19.

SEQ ID NO: 37 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 18.

SEQ ID NO: 38 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 20.

SEQ ID NO: 39 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 20.

SEQ ID NO: 40 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 21.

SEQ ID NO: 41 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 21.

SEQ ID NO: 42 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 22.

SEQ ID NO: 43 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 22.

SEQ ID NO: 44 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 23.

SEQ ID NO: 45 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 23.

SEQ ID NO: 46 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 24.

SEQ ID NO: 47 is a genomic sequence derived from Zea mays L associatedwith DER resistance locus 24.

SEQ ID NO: 48 is a forward PCR primer for the amplification of SEQ IDNO: 27.

SEQ ID NO: 49 is a reverse PCR primer for the amplification of SEQ IDNO: 27.

SEQ ID NO: 50 is a forward PCR primer for the amplification of SEQ IDNO: 28.

SEQ ID NO: 51 is a reverse PCR primer for the amplification of SEQ IDNO: 28.

SEQ ID NO: 52 is a forward PCR primer for the amplification of SEQ IDNO: 5.

SEQ ID NO: 53 is a reverse PCR primer for the amplification of SEQ IDNO: 5.

SEQ ID NO: 54 is a forward PCR primer for the amplification of SEQ IDNO: 6.

SEQ ID NO: 55 is a reverse PCR primer for the amplification of SEQ IDNO: 6.

SEQ ID NO: 56 is a probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ ID NO: 27.

SEQ ID NO: 57 is a second probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 27.

SEQ ID NO: 58 is a probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ ID NO: 28.

SEQ ID NO: 59 is a second probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 28.

SEQ ID NO: 60 is a probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ ID NO: 5.

SEQ ID NO: 61 is a second probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 5.

SEQ ID NO: 62 is a probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ ID NO: 6.

SEQ ID NO: 63 is a second probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 6.

SEQ ID NO: 64 is a third probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 27.

SEQ ID NO: 65 is a fourth probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 27.

SEQ ID NO: 66 is a third probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 28.

SEQ ID NO: 67 is a fourth probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 28.

SEQ ID NO: 68 is a third probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 5.

SEQ ID NO: 69 is a fourth probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 5.

SEQ ID NO: 70 is a third probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 6.

SEQ ID NO: 71 is a fourth probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 6.

SEQ ID NO: 72 is a fifth probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 27.

SEQ ID NO: 73 is a sixth probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 27.

SEQ ID NO: 74 is a fifth probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 28.

SEQ ID NO: 75 is a sixth probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 28.

SEQ ID NO: 76 is a fifth probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 5.

SEQ ID NO: 77 is a sixth probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 5.

SEQ ID NO: 78 is a fifth probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 6.

SEQ ID NO: 79 is a sixth probe for the detection of the SNP of SEQ IDNO: 6.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part ofthe specification, illustrate the embodiments of the present inventionand together with the description, serve to explain the principles ofthe invention.

In the drawings:

FIG. 1. Displays DER Resistance Loci associated with DER resistance inCV183/CV174+01HGI4. In the final column indicating Geography, SA isSouth Africa, AR is Argentina, and U.S. is the United States of America.

FIG. 2. Displays DER Resistance Loci (QTL) and SNP markers associatedwith DER resistance in the CV128/CV162 population in Central Brazil.

FIG. 3. Displays DER Resistance Loci (QTL) and SNP markers associatedwith DER resistance in the CV128/CV162 population in Central Brazil.Data were from a CV128*2/CV162 Mapping Population in Central Brazil withS. macrospora.

FIG. 4. Displays DER Resistance Loci (QTL) and SNP markers associatedwith DER resistance in the CV128/CV162 population in Central Brazil.Data are for a CV128*2/CV162 Mapping Population in Central Brazil withS. maydis.

FIG. 5. Displays Resistance Loci (QTL) and SNP markers associated withDER resistance in the CV162/CV129+CV128 mapping population in CentralBrazil. Under “Effect”, “dom” represents “dominant”.

FIG. 6. Displays Resistance Loci (QTL) and SNP markers associated withDER resistance in the CV162/CV129+CV128 population.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The definitions and methods provided herein define the present inventionand guide those of ordinary skill in the art in the practice of thepresent invention. Unless otherwise noted, terms are to be understoodaccording to conventional usage by those of ordinary skill in therelevant art. Definitions of common terms in molecular biology may alsobe found in Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of The Cell, 3^(rd)Edition, Garland Publishing, Inc.: New York, 1994; Rieger et al.,Glossary of Genetics: Classical and Molecular, 5th edition,Springer-Verlag: New York, 1991; and Lewin, Genes V, Oxford UniversityPress: New York, 1994. The nomenclature for DNA bases as set forth at 37CFR §1.822 is used.

As used herein, “resistance allele” means the isolated nucleic acidsequence that includes the polymorphic allele associated with resistanceto Stenocarpella maydis and Stenocarpella macrospora.

As used herein, “resistance allele” means the isolated nucleic acidsequence that includes the polymorphic allele associated with resistanceto Stenocarpella maydis and Stenocarpella macrospora.

An “allele” refers to an alternative sequence at a particular locus; thelength of an allele can be as small as 1 nucleotide base, but istypically larger. Allelic sequence can be amino acid sequence or nucleicacid sequence.

A “locus” is a short sequence that is usually unique and usually foundat one particular location in the genome by a point of reference; e.g.,a short DNA sequence that is a gene, or part of a gene or intergenicregion. A locus of this invention can be a unique PCR product at aparticular location in the genome. The loci of this invention compriseone or more polymorphisms; i.e., alternative alleles present in someindividuals.

As used herein, “polymorphism” means the presence of one or morevariations of a nucleic acid sequence at one or more loci in apopulation of one or more individuals. The variation may comprise but isnot limited to one or more base changes, the insertion of one or morenucleotides or the deletion of one or more nucleotides. A polymorphismincludes a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), a simple sequencerepeat (SSR) and indels, which are insertions and deletions. Apolymorphism may arise from random processes in nucleic acidreplication, through mutagenesis, as a result of mobile genomicelements, from copy number variation and during the process of meiosis,such as unequal crossing over, genome duplication and chromosome breaksand fusions. The variation can be commonly found or may exist at lowfrequency within a population, the former having greater utility ingeneral plant breeding and the later may be associated with rare butimportant phenotypic variation.

As used herein, “marker” means a polymorphic nucleic acid sequence ornucleic acid feature. A “polymorphism” is a variation among individualsin sequence, particularly in DNA sequence, or feature, such as atranscriptional profile or methylation pattern. Useful polymorphismsinclude single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions or deletionsin DNA sequence (Indels), simple sequence repeats of DNA sequence (SSRs)a restriction fragment length polymorphism, a haplotype, and a tag SNP.A genetic marker, a gene, a DNA-derived sequence, a RNA-derivedsequence, a promoter, a 5′ untranslated region of a gene, a 3′untranslated region of a gene, microRNA, siRNA, a QTL, a satellitemarker, a transgene, mRNA, ds mRNA, a transcriptional profile, and amethylation pattern may comprise polymorphisms. In a broader aspect, a“marker” can be a detectable characteristic that can be used todiscriminate between heritable differences between organisms. Examplesof such characteristics may include genetic markers, proteincomposition, protein levels, oil composition, oil levels, carbohydratecomposition, carbohydrate levels, fatty acid composition, fatty acidlevels, amino acid composition, amino acid levels, biopolymers,pharmaceuticals, starch composition, starch levels, fermentable starch,fermentation yield, fermentation efficiency, energy yield, secondarycompounds, metabolites, morphological characteristics, and agronomiccharacteristics.

As used herein, “marker assay” means a method for detecting apolymorphism at a particular locus using a particular method, e.g.measurement of at least one phenotype (such as seed color, flower color,or other visually detectable trait), restriction fragment lengthpolymorphism (RFLP), single base extension, electrophoresis, sequencealignment, allelic specific oligonucleotide hybridization (ASO), randomamplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), microarray-based technologies, andnucleic acid sequencing technologies, etc.

As used herein, “typing” refers to any method whereby the specificallelic form of a given corn genomic polymorphism is determined. Forexample, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is typed by determiningwhich nucleotide is present (i.e. an A, G, T, or C). Insertion/deletions(Indels) are determined by determining if the Indel is present. Indelscan be typed by a variety of assays including, but not limited to,marker assays.

As used herein, the phrase “immediately adjacent”, when used to describea nucleic acid molecule that hybridizes to DNA containing apolymorphism, refers to a nucleic acid that hybridizes to DNA sequencesthat directly abut the polymorphic nucleotide base position. Forexample, a nucleic acid molecule that can be used in a single baseextension assay is “immediately adjacent” to the polymorphism.

As used herein, “interrogation position” refers to a physical positionon a solid support that can be queried to obtain genotyping data for oneor more predetermined genomic polymorphisms.

As used herein, “consensus sequence” refers to a constructed DNAsequence which identifies SNP and Indel polymorphisms in alleles at alocus. Consensus sequence can be based on either strand of DNA at thelocus and states the nucleotide base of either one of each SNP in thelocus and the nucleotide bases of all Indels in the locus. Thus,although a consensus sequence may not be a copy of an actual DNAsequence, a consensus sequence is useful for precisely designing primersand probes for actual polymorphisms in the locus.

As used herein, the term “single nucleotide polymorphism,” also referredto by the abbreviation “SNP,” means a polymorphism at a single sitewherein the polymorphism constitutes a single base pair change, aninsertion of one or more base pairs, or a deletion of one or more basepairs.

As used herein, “genotype” means the genetic component of the phenotypeand it can be indirectly characterized using markers or directlycharacterized by nucleic acid sequencing. Suitable markers include aphenotypic character, a metabolic profile, a genetic marker, or someother type of marker. A genotype may constitute an allele for at leastone genetic marker locus or a haplotype for at least one haplotypewindow. In some embodiments, a genotype may represent a single locus andin others it may represent a genome-wide set of loci. In anotherembodiment, the genotype can reflect the sequence of a portion of achromosome, an entire chromosome, a portion of the genome, and theentire genome.

As used herein, “phenotype” means the detectable characteristics of acell or organism which are a manifestation of gene expression.

As used herein, “linkage” refers to relative frequency at which types ofgametes are produced in a cross. For example, if locus A has genes “A”or “a” and locus B has genes “B” or “b” and a cross between parent Iwith AABB and parent B with aabb will produce four possible gameteswhere the genes are segregated into AB, Ab, aB and ab. The nullexpectation is that there will be independent equal segregation intoeach of the four possible genotypes, i.e. with no linkage ¼ of thegametes will of each genotype. Segregation of gametes into a genotypesdiffering from ¼ are attributed to linkage.

As used herein, “linkage disequilibrium” is defined in the context ofthe relative frequency of gamete types in a population of manyindividuals in a single generation. If the frequency of allele A is p, ais p′, B is q and b is q′, then the expected frequency (with no linkagedisequilibrium) of genotype AB is pq, Ab is pq′, aB is p′q and ab isp′q′. Any deviation from the expected frequency is called linkagedisequilibrium. Two loci are the to be “genetically linked” when theyare in linkage disequilibrium.

As used herein, “quantitative trait locus (QTL)” means a locus thatcontrols to some degree numerically representable traits that areusually continuously distributed.

As used herein, the term “inbred” means a line that has been bred forgenetic homogeneity.

As used herein, the term “hybrid” means a progeny of mating between atleast two genetically dissimilar parents. Without limitation, examplesof mating schemes include single crosses, modified single cross, doublemodified single cross, three-way cross, modified three-way cross, anddouble cross wherein at least one parent in a modified cross is theprogeny of a cross between sister lines.

As used herein, the term “tester” means a line used in a testcross withanother line wherein the tester and the lines tested are from differentgermplasm pools. A tester may be isogenic or nonisogenic.

As used herein, the term “corn” means Zea mays or maize and includes allplant varieties that can be bred with corn, including wild maizespecies.

As used herein, the term “comprising” means “including but not limitedto”.

As used herein, the term “elite line” means any line that has resultedfrom breeding and selection for superior agronomic performance. An eliteplant is any plant from an elite line.

To the extent to which any of the preceding definitions is inconsistentwith definitions provided in any patent or non-patent referenceincorporated herein or in any reference found elsewhere, it isunderstood that the preceding definition will be used herein.

In general, these compositions and methods can be used to genotype cornplants from the genus Zea. More specifically, corn plants from thespecies Zea mays and the subspecies Zea mays L. ssp. Mays can begenotyped using these compositions and methods. In an additional aspect,the corn plant is from the group Zea mays L. subsp. mays Indentata,otherwise known as dent corn. In another aspect, the corn plant is fromthe group Zea mays L. subsp. mays Indurata, otherwise known as flintcorn. In another aspect, the corn plant is from the group Zea mays L.subsp. mays Saccharata, otherwise known as sweet corn. In anotheraspect, the corn plant is from the group Zea mays L. subsp. maysAmylacea, otherwise known as flour corn. In a further aspect, the cornplant is from the group Zea mays L. subsp. mays Everta, otherwise knownas pop corn. Zea or corn plants that can be genotyped with thecompositions and methods described herein include hybrids, inbreds,partial inbreds, or members of defined or undefined populations.

Plants of the present invention can be a corn plant that is veryresistant, resistant, substantially resistant, mid-resistant,comparatively resistant, partially resistant, mid-susceptible, orsusceptible.

In a preferred aspect, the present invention provides a corn plant to beassayed for resistance or susceptibility to DER by any method todetermine whether a corn plant is very resistant, resistant,substantially resistant, mid-resistant, comparatively resistant,partially resistant, mid-susceptible, or susceptible.

Plants are artificially inoculated with either a mixture containingStenocarpella maydis and Stenocarpella macrospora isolate or theisolates of either pathogen. Methods of inoculation include depositionof fungal spores in the grain stalk, the whorl method (Flett andMcLaren; Plant Disease 78:587-589 (1994); Bensch, M. J., S. Afr. J.Plant Soil 12: 172-174), and the method according to Chambers (PlantDisease 72:529-531 (1988)), Klapproth and Hawk (Plant Disease 75:1057-1060 (1991), and Villena (1969). Phenotyping for DER is done by thefollowing methods. Resistance or susceptibility is determined after handharvesting ears. In one method, percentage of rotten ears of total earsin a plot is calculated and used as phenotypic data. In another method,ears are shelled after harvesting. Total grain weight and rotten grainweight are determined. Percentage rotten grain is then used asphenotypic data.

In another aspect, the corn plant can show a comparative resistancecompared to a non-resistant control corn plant. In this aspect, acontrol corn plant will preferably be genetically similar except for theDER resistance allele or alleles in question. Such plants can be grownunder similar conditions with equivalent or near equivalent exposure tothe pathogen.

A disease resistance QTL of the present invention may be introduced intoan elite corn inbred line. An “elite line” is any line that has resultedfrom breeding and selection for superior agronomic performance.

A DER resistance QTL of the present invention may also be introducedinto an elite corn plant comprising one or more transgenes conferringherbicide tolerance, increased yield, insect control, fungal diseaseresistance, virus resistance, nematode resistance, bacterial diseaseresistance, mycoplasma disease resistance, modified oils production,high oil production, high protein production, germination and seedlinggrowth control, enhanced animal and human nutrition, low raffinose,environmental stress resistant, increased digestibility, industrialenzymes, pharmaceutical proteins, peptides and small molecules, improvedprocessing traits, improved flavor, nitrogen fixation, hybrid seedproduction, reduced allergenicity, biopolymers, and biofuels amongothers. In one aspect, the herbicide tolerance is selected from thegroup consisting of glyphosate, dicamba, glufosinate, sulfonylurea,bromoxynil and norflurazon herbicides. These traits can be provided bymethods of plant biotechnology as transgenes in corn.

A disease resistance QTL allele or alleles can be introduced from anyplant that contains that allele (donor) to any recipient corn plant. Inone aspect, the recipient corn plant can contain additional DERresistance loci. In another aspect, the recipient corn plant can containa transgene. In another aspect, while maintaining the introduced QTL,the genetic contribution of the plant providing the disease resistanceQTL can be reduced by back-crossing or other suitable approaches. In oneaspect, the nuclear genetic material derived from the donor material inthe corn plant can be less than or about 50%, less than or about 25%,less than or about 13%, less than or about 5%, 3%, 2% or 1%, but thatgenetic material contains the DER resistance locus or loci of interest.

It is further understood that a corn plant of the present invention mayexhibit the characteristics of any relative maturity group. In anaspect, the maturity group is selected from the group consisting ofRM90-95, RM 95-100, RM 100-105, RM 105-110, RM 110-115, and RM 115-120.

An allele of a QTL can, of course, comprise multiple genes or othergenetic factors even within a contiguous genomic region or linkagegroup, such as a haplotype. As used herein, an allele of a diseaseresistance locus can therefore encompass more than one gene or othergenetic factor where each individual gene or genetic component is alsocapable of exhibiting allelic variation and where each gene or geneticfactor is also capable of eliciting a phenotypic effect on thequantitative trait in question. In an aspect of the present inventionthe allele of a QTL comprises one or more genes or other genetic factorsthat are also capable of exhibiting allelic variation. The use of theterm “an allele of a QTL” is thus not intended to exclude a QTL thatcomprises more than one gene or other genetic factor. Specifically, an“allele of a QTL” in the present invention can denote a haplotype withina haplotype window wherein a phenotype can be disease resistance. Ahaplotype window is a contiguous genomic region that can be defined, andtracked, with a set of one or more polymorphic markers wherein thepolymorphisms indicate identity by descent. A haplotype within thatwindow can be defined by the unique fingerprint of alleles at eachmarker. As used herein, an allele is one of several alternative forms ofa gene occupying a given locus on a chromosome. When all the allelespresent at a given locus on a chromosome are the same, that plant ishomozygous at that locus. If the alleles present at a given locus on achromosome differ, that plant is heterozygous at that locus. Plants ofthe present invention may be homozygous or heterozygous at anyparticular DER locus or for a particular polymorphic marker.

The present invention also provides for parts of the plants of thepresent invention. Plant parts, without limitation, include seed,endosperm, ovule and pollen. In a particularly preferred aspect of thepresent invention, the plant part is a seed.

The present invention also provides a container of corn in which greaterthan 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, or 99% of the seeds comprising 1, 2,3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,23, or 24 DER resistance loci. The container of corn seeds can containany number, weight, or volume of seeds. For example, a container cancontain at least, or greater than, about 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400,500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000 ormore seeds. In another aspect, a container can contain about, or greaterthan about, 1 gram, 5 grams, 10 grams, 15 grams, 20 grams, 25 grams, 50grams, 100 grams, 250 grams, 500 grams, or 1000 grams of seeds.Alternatively, the container can contain at least, or greater than,about 0 ounces, 1 ounce, 5 ounces, 10 ounces, 1 pound, 2 pounds, 3pounds, 4 pounds, 5 pounds, 10 pounds, 15 pounds, 20 pounds, 25 pounds,or 50 pounds or more seeds.

Containers of corn seeds can be any container available in the art. Forexample, a container can be a box, a bag, a can, a packet, a pouch, atape roll, a pail, or a tube.

In another aspect, the seeds contained in the containers of corn seedscan be treated or untreated corn seeds. In one aspect, the seeds can betreated to improve germination, for example, by priming the seeds, or bydisinfection to protect against seed-born pathogens. In another aspect,seeds can be coated with any available coating to improve, for example,plantability, seed emergence, and protection against seed-bornpathogens. Seed coating can be any form of seed coating including, butnot limited to, pelleting, film coating, and encrustments.

Plants or parts thereof of the present invention may also be grown inculture and regenerated. Methods for the regeneration of Zea mays plantsfrom various tissue types and methods for the tissue culture of Zea maysare known in the art (for example, Bhaskaran et al., 1990 Crop Sci.30:1328-1336). Regeneration techniques for plants such as Zea mays canuse as the starting material a variety of tissue or cell types. With Zeamays in particular, regeneration processes have been developed thatbegin with certain differentiated tissue types such as meristems,(Sairam et al., 2003 Genome 46:323-3). Regeneration of mature Zea maysplants from tissue culture by organogenesis and embryogenesis has alsobeen reported (Wang 1987 Plant Cell. Rep. 6:360-362; Chang 1983 PlantCell. Rep. 2:18-185; Green et al., 1975 Crop Sci. 15:417-421). Recently,regeneration of corn from split seeds was also reported (Al-Abed et al.,2006 Planta 223:1355-1366).

The present invention also provides a disease resistant corn plantselected for by screening for disease resistance or susceptibility inthe corn plant, the selection comprising interrogating genomic nucleicacids for the presence of a marker molecule that is genetically linkedto an allele of a QTL associated with disease resistance in the cornplant, where the allele of a QTL is also located on a linkage groupassociated with DER resistance.

The present invention provides a method of introgressing an alleleassociated with diplodia ear rot (DER) resistance into a corn plantcomprising (a) crossing at least one DER resistant corn plant with atleast one second corn plant in order to form a population, (b)genotyping with at least one second corn plant in the population withrespect to a corn genomic nucleic acid marker selected from the group ofSEQ ID NOs: 1 through 47, and (c) selecting from the population at leastone corn plant comprising at least one genotype corresponding to a DERresistant corn plant.

The present invention also includes a method of introgressing an alleleinto a corn plant comprising: (a) crossing at least one DER resistantcorn plant with at least one DER sensitive corn plant in order to form apopulation; (b) screening the population with one or more nucleic acidmarkers to determine if one or more corn plants from the populationcontains a DER resistance allele, wherein the DER resistance allele isan allele selected from the group consisting of DER resistance locus 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,22, 23, or DER resistance locus 24. In certain embodiments, thesemethods can further comprise the step of selecting a plant thatcomprises one or more DER resistance loci selected from the groupconsisting of DER resistance locus 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, or DER resistance locus24. In certain embodiments of this method, the population formed,screened, and/or selected from can be a segregating population.

The present invention includes isolated nucleic acid molecules. Suchmolecules include those nucleic acid molecules capable of detecting apolymorphism genetically or physically linked to a DER resistance locus.Such molecules can be referred to as markers. Additional markers can beobtained that are linked to DER resistance locus 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, or 24 byavailable techniques. In one aspect, the nucleic acid molecule iscapable of detecting the presence or absence of a marker located lessthan 30, 20, 10, 5, 2, or 1 centimorgans from a DER resistance locus.Exemplary nucleic acid molecules with corresponding map positions areprovided in U.S. Patent Application No. 2005/0218305 and U.S. patentapplication Ser. Nos. 11/504,538 and 60/930,609. In another aspect, amarker exhibits a LOD score of 2 or greater, 3 or greater, or 4 orgreater with DER, measuring using Qgene™ Version 2.23 (Department ofPlant Breeding and Biometry, 266 Emerson Hall, Cornell University,Ithaca, N.Y., 1996) and default parameters. In another aspect, thenucleic acid molecule is capable of detecting a marker in a locusselected from the group DER resistance locus 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, or 24. In afurther aspect, a nucleic acid molecule is selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NO: 1 through SEQ ID NO: 79 fragments thereof,complements thereof, and nucleic acid molecules capable of specificallyhybridizing to one or more of these nucleic acid molecules.

In a preferred aspect, a nucleic acid molecule of the present inventionincludes those that will specifically hybridize to one or more of thenucleic acid molecules set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 through SEQ ID NO: 79or complements thereof or fragments of either under moderately stringentconditions, for example at about 2.0×SSC and about 65° C. In aparticularly preferred aspect, a nucleic acid of the present inventionwill specifically hybridize to one or more of the nucleic acid moleculesset forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 through SEQ ID NO: 79 or complements orfragments of either under high stringency conditions. In one aspect ofthe present invention, a preferred marker nucleic acid molecule of thepresent invention has the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 through SEQ ID NO: 79 or complements thereof or fragments of either.In another aspect of the present invention, a preferred marker nucleicacid molecule of the present invention shares between 80% and 100% or90% and 100% sequence identity with the nucleic acid sequences set forthin SEQ ID NO: 1 through SEQ ID NO: 79 or complements thereof orfragments of either. In a further aspect of the present invention, apreferred marker nucleic acid molecule of the present invention sharesbetween 95% and 100% sequence identity with the sequences set forth inSEQ ID NO: 1 through SEQ ID NO: 79 or complements thereof or fragmentsof either. In a more preferred aspect of the present invention, apreferred marker nucleic acid molecule of the present invention sharesbetween 98% and 100% sequence identity with the nucleic acid sequenceset forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 through SEQ ID NO: 79 or complement thereof orfragments of either.

Nucleic acid molecules or fragments thereof are capable of specificallyhybridizing to other nucleic acid molecules under certain circumstances.As used herein, two nucleic acid molecules are capable of specificallyhybridizing to one another if the two molecules are capable of formingan anti-parallel, double-stranded nucleic acid structure. A nucleic acidmolecule is the “complement” of another nucleic acid molecule if theyexhibit complete complementarity. As used herein, molecules that areexhibit “complete complementarity” when every nucleotide of one of themolecules is complementary to a nucleotide of the other. Two moleculesare “minimally complementary” if they can hybridize to one another withsufficient stability to permit them to remain annealed to one anotherunder at least conventional “low-stringency” conditions. Similarly, themolecules are “complementary” if they can hybridize to one another withsufficient stability to permit them to remain annealed to one anotherunder conventional “high-stringency” conditions. Conventional stringencyconditions are described by Sambrook et al., In: Molecular Cloning, ALaboratory Manual, 2nd Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold SpringHarbor, N.Y. (1989), and by Haymes et al., In: Nucleic AcidHybridization, A Practical Approach, IRL Press, Washington, D.C. (1985).Departures from complete complementarity are therefore permissible, aslong as such departures do not completely preclude the capacity of themolecules to form a double-stranded structure. In order for a nucleicacid molecule to serve as a primer or probe it need only be sufficientlycomplementary in sequence to be able to form a stable double-strandedstructure under the particular solvent and salt concentrations employed.

As used herein, a substantially homologous sequence is a nucleic acidsequence that will specifically hybridize to the complement of thenucleic acid sequence to which it is being compared under highstringency conditions. The nucleic-acid probes and primers of thepresent invention can hybridize under stringent conditions to a targetDNA sequence. The term “stringent hybridization conditions” is definedas conditions under which a probe or primer hybridizes specifically witha target sequence(s) and not with non-target sequences, as can bedetermined empirically. The term “stringent conditions” is functionallydefined with regard to the hybridization of a nucleic-acid probe to atarget nucleic acid (i.e., to a particular nucleic-acid sequence ofinterest) by the specific hybridization procedure discussed in Sambrooket al., 1989, at 9.52-9.55. See also, Sambrook et al., 1989 at9.47-9.52, 9.56-9.58; Kanehisa 1984 Nucl. Acids Res. 12:203-213; andWetmur et al., 1968 J. Mol. Biol. 31:349-370. Appropriate stringencyconditions that promote DNA hybridization are, for example, 6.0× sodiumchloride/sodium citrate (SSC) at about 45° C., followed by a wash of2.0×SSC at 50° C., are known to those skilled in the art or can be foundin Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y.,1989, 6.3.1-6.3.6. For example, the salt concentration in the wash stepcan be selected from a low stringency of about 2.0×SSC at 50° C. to ahigh stringency of about 0.2×SSC at 50° C. In addition, the temperaturein the wash step can be increased from low stringency conditions at roomtemperature, about 22° C., to high stringency conditions at about 65° C.Both temperature and salt may be varied, or either the temperature orthe salt concentration may be held constant while the other variable ischanged.

For example, hybridization using DNA or RNA probes or primers can beperformed at 65° C. in 6×SSC, 0.5% SDS, 5×Denhardt's, 100 μg/mLnonspecific DNA (e.g., sonicated salmon sperm DNA) with washing at0.5×SSC, 0.5% SDS at 65° C., for high stringency.

It is contemplated that lower stringency hybridization conditions suchas lower hybridization and/or washing temperatures can be used toidentify related sequences having a lower degree of sequence similarityif specificity of binding of the probe or primer to target sequence(s)is preserved. Accordingly, the nucleotide sequences of the presentinvention can be used for their ability to selectively form duplexmolecules with complementary stretches of DNA, RNA, or cDNA fragments.

A fragment of a nucleic acid molecule can be any sized fragment andillustrative fragments include fragments of nucleic acid sequences setforth in SEQ ID NO: 1 through SEQ ID NO: 79 and complements thereof. Inone aspect, a fragment can be between 15 and 25, 15 and 30, 15 and 40,15 and 50, 15 and 100, 20 and 25, 20 and 30, 20 and 40, 20 and 50, 20and 100, 25 and 30, 25 and 40, 25 and 50, 25 and 100, 30 and 40, 30 and50, and 30 and 100. In another aspect, the fragment can be greater than10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 100, or 250 nucleotides.

Additional genetic markers can be used to select plants with an alleleof a QTL associated with fungal disease resistance of DER of the presentinvention. Examples of public marker databases include, for example:Maize Genome Database, Agricultural Research Service, United StatesDepartment of Agriculture. Genetic markers of the present inventioninclude “dominant” and “codominant” markers. “Codominant markers” revealthe presence of two or more alleles (two per diploid individual).“Dominant markers” reveal the presence of only a single allele. Thepresence of the dominant marker phenotype (e.g., a band of DNA) is anindication that one allele is present in either the homozygous orheterozygous condition. The absence of the dominant marker phenotype(e.g., absence of a DNA band) is merely evidence that “some other”undefined allele is present. In the case of populations whereindividuals are predominantly homozygous and loci are predominantlydimorphic, dominant and codominant markers can be equally valuable. Aspopulations become more heterozygous and multiallelic, codominantmarkers often become more informative of the genotype than dominantmarkers.

In another embodiment, markers, such as single sequence repeat markers(SSR), AFLP markers, RFLP markers, RAPD markers, phenotypic markers,isozyme markers, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions ordeletions (Indels), single feature polymorphisms (SFPs, for example, asdescribed in Borevitz et al., 2003 Gen. Res. 13:513-523), microarraytranscription profiles, DNA-derived sequences, and RNA-derived sequencesthat are genetically linked to or correlated with alleles of a QTL ofthe present invention can be utilized.

In one embodiment, nucleic acid-based analyses for the presence orabsence of the genetic polymorphism can be used for the selection ofseeds in a breeding population. A wide variety of genetic markers forthe analysis of genetic polymorphisms are available and known to thoseof skill in the art. The analysis may be used to select for genes, QTL,alleles, or genomic regions (haplotypes) that comprise or are linked toa genetic marker.

Herein, nucleic acid analysis methods are known in the art and include,but are not limited to, PCR-based detection methods (for example, TaqManassays), microarray methods, and nucleic acid sequencing methods. In oneembodiment, the detection of polymorphic sites in a sample of DNA, RNA,or cDNA may be facilitated through the use of nucleic acid amplificationmethods. Such methods specifically increase the concentration ofpolynucleotides that span the polymorphic site, or include that site andsequences located either distal or proximal to it. Such amplifiedmolecules can be readily detected by gel electrophoresis, fluorescencedetection methods, or other means.

A method of achieving such amplification employs the polymerase chainreaction (PCR) (Mullis et al., 1986 Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant.Biol. 51:263-273; European Patent No. 50,424; European Patent No.84,796; European Patent No. 258,017; European Patent No. 237,362;European Patent No. 201,184; U.S. Pat. No. 4,683,202; U.S. Pat. No.4,582,788; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,683,194), using primer pairs that arecapable of hybridizing to the proximal sequences that define apolymorphism in its double-stranded form.

Polymorphisms in DNA sequences can be detected or typed by a variety ofeffective methods well known in the art including, but not limited to,those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,468,613 and 5,217,863; 5,210,015;5,876,930; 6,030,787; 6,004,744; 6,013,431; 5,595,890; 5,762,876;5,945,283; 5,468,613; 6,090,558; 5,800,944; and 5,616,464, all of whichare incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. However, thecompositions and methods of this invention can be used in conjunctionwith any polymorphism typing method to type polymorphisms in corngenomic DNA samples. These corn genomic DNA samples used include but arenot limited to, corn genomic DNA isolated directly from a corn plant,cloned corn genomic DNA, or amplified corn genomic DNA.

For instance, polymorphisms in DNA sequences can be detected byhybridization to allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) probes asdisclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,468,613 and 5,217,863. U.S. Pat. No.5,468,613 discloses allele specific oligonucleotide hybridizations wheresingle or multiple nucleotide variations in nucleic acid sequence can bedetected in nucleic acids by a process in which the sequence containingthe nucleotide variation is amplified, spotted on a membrane and treatedwith a labeled sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe.

Target nucleic acid sequence can also be detected by probe ligationmethods as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,800,944 where sequence ofinterest is amplified and hybridized to probes followed by ligation todetect a labeled part of the probe.

Microarrays can also be used for polymorphism detection, whereinoligonucleotide probe sets are assembled in an overlapping fashion torepresent a single sequence such that a difference in the targetsequence at one point would result in partial probe hybridization(Borevitz et al., Genome Res. 13:513-523 (2003); Cui et al.,Bioinformatics 21:3852-3858 (2005). On any one microarray, it isexpected there will be a plurality of target sequences, which mayrepresent genes and/or noncoding regions wherein each target sequence isrepresented by a series of overlapping oligonucleotides, rather than bya single probe. This platform provides for high throughput screening aplurality of polymorphisms. A single-feature polymorphism (SFP) is apolymorphism detected by a single probe in an oligonucleotide array,wherein a feature is a probe in the array. Typing of target sequences bymicroarray-based methods is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,799,122;6,913,879; and 6,996,476.

Target nucleic acid sequence can also be detected by probe linkingmethods as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,616,464 employing at least onepair of probes having sequences homologous to adjacent portions of thetarget nucleic acid sequence and having side chains which non-covalentlybind to form a stem upon base pairing of the probes to the targetnucleic acid sequence. At least one of the side chains has aphotoactivatable group which can form a covalent cross-link with theother side chain member of the stem.

Other methods for detecting SNPs and Indels include single baseextension (SBE) methods. Examples of SBE methods include, but are notlimited, to those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,004,744; 6,013,431;5,595,890; 5,762,876; and 5,945,283. SBE methods are based on extensionof a nucleotide primer that is adjacent to a polymorphism to incorporatea detectable nucleotide residue upon extension of the primer. In certainembodiments, the SBE method uses three synthetic oligonucleotides. Twoof the oligonucleotides serve as PCR primers and are complementary tosequence of the locus of corn genomic DNA which flanks a regioncontaining the polymorphism to be assayed. Following amplification ofthe region of the corn genome containing the polymorphism, the PCRproduct is mixed with the third oligonucleotide (called an extensionprimer) which is designed to hybridize to the amplified DNA adjacent tothe polymorphism in the presence of DNA polymerase and twodifferentially labeled dideoxynucleosidetriphosphates. If thepolymorphism is present on the template, one of the labeleddideoxynucleosidetriphosphates can be added to the primer in a singlebase chain extension. The allele present is then inferred by determiningwhich of the two differential labels was added to the extension primer.Homozygous samples will result in only one of the two labeled basesbeing incorporated and thus only one of the two labels will be detected.Heterozygous samples have both alleles present, and will thus directincorporation of both labels (into different molecules of the extensionprimer) and thus both labels will be detected.

In a preferred method for detecting polymorphisms, SNPs and Indels canbe detected by methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,210,015; 5,876,930;and 6,030,787 in which an oligonucleotide probe having a 5 ‘fluorescentreporter dye and a 3′ quencher dye covalently linked to the 5’ and 3′ends of the probe. When the probe is intact, the proximity of thereporter dye to the quencher dye results in the suppression of thereporter dye fluorescence, e.g. by Forster-type energy transfer. DuringPCR forward and reverse primers hybridize to a specific sequence of thetarget DNA flanking a polymorphism while the hybridization probehybridizes to polymorphism-containing sequence within the amplified PCRproduct. In the subsequent PCR cycle DNA polymerase with 5′→3′exonuclease activity cleaves the probe and separates the reporter dyefrom the quencher dye resulting in increased fluorescence of thereporter.

For the purpose of QTL mapping, the markers included should bediagnostic of origin in order for inferences to be made about subsequentpopulations. SNP markers are ideal for mapping because the likelihoodthat a particular SNP allele is derived from independent origins in theextent populations of a particular species is very low. As such, SNPmarkers are useful for tracking and assisting introgression of QTLs,particularly in the case of haplotypes.

The genetic linkage of additional marker molecules can be established bya gene mapping model such as, without limitation, the flanking markermodel reported by Lander et al., (Lander et al., 1989 Genetics,121:185-199), and the interval mapping, based on maximum likelihoodmethods described therein, and implemented in the software packageMAPMAKER/QTL (Lincoln and Lander, Mapping Genes Controlling QuantitativeTraits Using MAPMAKER/QTL, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research,Massachusetts, (1990). Additional software includes Qgene, Version 2.23(1996), Department of Plant Breeding and Biometry, 266 Emerson Hall,Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.). Use of Qgene software is aparticularly preferred approach.

A maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) for the presence of a marker iscalculated, together with an MLE assuming no QTL effect, to avoid falsepositives. A log₁₀ of an odds ratio (LOD) is then calculated as:LOD=log₁₀ (MLE for the presence of a QTL/MLE given no linked QTL). TheLOD score essentially indicates how much more likely the data are tohave arisen assuming the presence of a QTL versus in its absence. TheLOD threshold value for avoiding a false positive with a givenconfidence, say 95%, depends on the number of markers and the length ofthe genome. Graphs indicating LOD thresholds are set forth in Lander etal., (1989), and further described by Arils and Moreno-González, PlantBreeding, Hayward, Bosemark, Romagosa (eds.) Chapman & Hall, London, pp.314-331 (1993).

Additional models can be used. Many modifications and alternativeapproaches to interval mapping have been reported, including the use ofnon-parametric methods (Kruglyak et al., 1995 Genetics, 139:1421-1428).Multiple regression methods or models can also be used, in which thetrait is regressed on a large number of markers (Jansen, Biometrics inPlant Breed, van Oijen, Jansen (eds.) Proceedings of the Ninth Meetingof the Eucarpia Section Biometrics in Plant Breeding, The Netherlands,pp. 116-124 (1994); Weber and Wricke, Advances in Plant Breeding,Blackwell, Berlin, 16 (1994)). Procedures combining interval mappingwith regression analysis, whereby the phenotype is regressed onto asingle putative QTL at a given marker interval, and at the same timeonto a number of markers that serve as “cofactors,” have been reportedby Jansen et al., (Jansen et al. 1994 Genetics, 136:1447-1455) and Zeng(Zeng 1994 Genetics 136:1457-1468). Generally, the use of cofactorsreduces the bias and sampling error of the estimated QTL positions (Utzand Melchinger, Biometrics in Plant Breeding, van Oijen, Jansen (eds.)Proceedings of the Ninth Meeting of the Eucarpia Section Biometrics inPlant Breeding, The Netherlands, pp. 195-204 (1994), thereby improvingthe precision and efficiency of QTL mapping (Zeng 1994). These modelscan be extended to multi-environment experiments to analyzegenotype-environment interactions (Jansen et al., 1995 Theor. Appl.Genet. 91:33-3).

Selection of appropriate mapping populations is important to mapconstruction. The choice of an appropriate mapping population depends onthe type of marker systems employed (Tanksley et al., Molecular mappingin plant chromosomes. chromosome structure and function: Impact of newconcepts J. P. Gustafson and R. Appels (eds.). Plenum Press, New York,pp. 157-173 (1988)). Consideration must be given to the source ofparents (adapted vs. exotic) used in the mapping population. Chromosomepairing and recombination rates can be severely disturbed (suppressed)in wide crosses (adapted×exotic) and generally yield greatly reducedlinkage distances. Wide crosses will usually provide segregatingpopulations with a relatively large array of polymorphisms when comparedto progeny in a narrow cross (adapted×adapted).

An F₂ population is the first generation of selfing. Usually a single F₁plant is selfed to generate a population segregating for all the genesin Mendelian (1:2:1) fashion. Maximum genetic information is obtainedfrom a completely classified F₂ population using a codominant markersystem (Mather, Measurement of Linkage in Heredity: Methuen and Co.,(1938)). In the case of dominant markers, progeny tests (e.g. F₃, BCF₂)are required to identify the heterozygotes, thus making it equivalent toa completely classified F₂ population. However, this procedure is oftenprohibitive because of the cost and time involved in progeny testing.Progeny testing of F₂ individuals is often used in map constructionwhere phenotypes do not consistently reflect genotype (e.g. diseaseresistance) or where trait expression is controlled by a QTL.Segregation data from progeny test populations (e.g. F₃ or BCF₂) can beused in map construction. Marker-assisted selection can then be appliedto cross progeny based on marker-trait map associations (F₂, F₃), wherelinkage groups have not been completely disassociated by recombinationevents (i.e., maximum disequilibrium).

Recombinant inbred lines (RIL) (genetically related lines; usually >F₅,developed from continuously selfing F₂ lines towards homozygosity) canbe used as a mapping population. Information obtained from dominantmarkers can be maximized by using RIL because all loci are homozygous ornearly so. Under conditions of tight linkage (i.e., about <10%recombination), dominant and co-dominant markers evaluated in RILpopulations provide more information per individual than either markertype in backcross populations (Reiter et al., 1992 Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. (USA) 89:1477-1481). However, as the distance between markersbecomes larger (i.e., loci become more independent), the information inRIL populations decreases dramatically.

Backcross populations (e.g., generated from a cross between a successfulvariety (recurrent parent) and another variety (donor parent) carrying atrait not present in the former) can be utilized as a mappingpopulation. A series of backcrosses to the recurrent parent can be madeto recover most of its desirable traits. Thus a population is createdconsisting of individuals nearly like the recurrent parent but eachindividual carries varying amounts or mosaic of genomic regions from thedonor parent. Backcross populations can be useful for mapping dominantmarkers if all loci in the recurrent parent are homozygous and the donorand recurrent parent have contrasting polymorphic marker alleles (Reiteret al., 1992). Information obtained from backcross populations usingeither codominant or dominant markers is less than that obtained from F₂populations because one, rather than two, recombinant gametes aresampled per plant. Backcross populations, however, are more informative(at low marker saturation) when compared to RILs as the distance betweenlinked loci increases in RIL populations (i.e. about 0.15%recombination). Increased recombination can be beneficial for resolutionof tight linkages, but may be undesirable in the construction of mapswith low marker saturation.

Near-isogenic lines (NIL) created by many backcrosses to produce anarray of individuals that are nearly identical in genetic compositionexcept for the trait or genomic region under interrogation can be usedas a mapping population. In mapping with NILs, only a portion of thepolymorphic loci are expected to map to a selected region.

Bulk segregant analysis (BSA) is a method developed for the rapididentification of linkage between markers and traits of interest(Michelmore et al. 1991 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.) 88:9828-9832).In BSA, two bulked DNA samples are drawn from a segregating populationoriginating from a single cross. These bulks contain individuals thatare identical for a particular trait (resistant or susceptible toparticular disease) or genomic region but arbitrary at unlinked regions(i.e. heterozygous). Regions unlinked to the target region will notdiffer between the bulked samples of many individuals in BSA.

Plants of the present invention can be part of or generated from abreeding program. The choice of breeding method depends on the mode ofplant reproduction, the heritability of the trait(s) being improved, andthe type of cultivar used commercially (e.g., F₁ hybrid cultivar,pureline cultivar, etc). A cultivar is a race or variety of a plantspecies that has been created or selected intentionally and maintainedthrough cultivation.

Selected, non-limiting approaches for breeding the plants of the presentinvention are set forth below. A breeding program can be enhanced usingmarker assisted selection (MAS) on the progeny of any cross. It isunderstood that nucleic acid markers of the present invention can beused in a MAS (breeding) program. It is further understood that anycommercial and non-commercial cultivars can be utilized in a breedingprogram. Factors such as, for example, emergence vigor, vegetativevigor, stress tolerance, disease resistance, branching, flowering, seedset, seed size, seed density, standability, and threshability etc. willgenerally dictate the choice.

For highly heritable traits, a choice of superior individual plantsevaluated at a single location will be effective, whereas for traitswith low heritability, selection should be based on mean values obtainedfrom replicated evaluations of families of related plants. Popularselection methods commonly include pedigree selection, modified pedigreeselection, mass selection, and recurrent selection. In a preferredaspect, a backcross or recurrent breeding program is undertaken.

The complexity of inheritance influences choice of the breeding method.Backcross breeding can be used to transfer one or a few favorable genesfor a highly heritable trait into a desirable cultivar. This approachhas been used extensively for breeding disease-resistant cultivars.Various recurrent selection techniques are used to improvequantitatively inherited traits controlled by numerous genes.

Breeding lines can be tested and compared to appropriate standards inenvironments representative of the commercial target area(s) for two ormore generations. The best lines are candidates for new commercialcultivars; those still deficient in traits may be used as parents toproduce new populations for further selection.

The development of new elite corn hybrids requires the development andselection of elite inbred lines, the crossing of these lines andselection of superior hybrid crosses. The hybrid seed can be produced bymanual crosses between selected male-fertile parents or by using malesterility systems. Additional data on parental lines, as well as thephenotype of the hybrid, influence the breeder's decision whether tocontinue with the specific hybrid cross.

Pedigree breeding and recurrent selection breeding methods can be usedto develop cultivars from breeding populations. Breeding programscombine desirable traits from two or more cultivars or variousbroad-based sources into breeding pools from which cultivars aredeveloped by selfing and selection of desired phenotypes. New cultivarscan be evaluated to determine which have commercial potential.

Backcross breeding has been used to transfer genes for a simplyinherited, highly heritable trait into a desirable homozygous cultivaror inbred line, which is the recurrent parent. The source of the traitto be transferred is called the donor parent. After the initial cross,individuals possessing the phenotype of the donor parent are selectedand repeatedly crossed (backcrossed) to the recurrent parent. Theresulting plant is expected to have most attributes of the recurrentparent (e.g., cultivar) and, in addition, the desirable traittransferred from the donor parent.

The single-seed descent procedure in the strict sense refers to plantinga segregating population, harvesting a sample of one seed per plant, andusing the one-seed sample to plant the next generation. When thepopulation has been advanced from the F₂ to the desired level ofinbreeding, the plants from which lines are derived will each trace todifferent F₂ individuals. The number of plants in a population declineseach generation due to failure of some seeds to germinate or some plantsto produce at least one seed. As a result, not all of the F₂ plantsoriginally sampled in the population will be represented by a progenywhen generation advance is completed.

Descriptions of other breeding methods that are commonly used fordifferent traits and crops can be found in one of several referencebooks (Allard, “Principles of Plant Breeding,” John Wiley & Sons, NY, U.of CA, Davis, Calif., 50-98, 1960; Simmonds, “Principles of CropImprovement,” Longman, Inc., NY, 369-399, 1979; Sneep and Hendriksen,“Plant Breeding Perspectives,” Wageningen (ed), Center for AgriculturalPublishing and Documentation, 1979; Fehr, In: Soybeans: Improvement,Production and Uses, 2nd Edition, Manograph., 16:249, 1987; Fehr,“Principles of Variety Development,” Theory and Technique, (Vol. 1) andCrop Species Soybean (Vol. 2), Iowa State Univ., Macmillan Pub. Co., NY,360-376, 1987).

An alternative to traditional QTL mapping involves achieving higherresolution by mapping haplotypes, versus individual markers (Fan et al.,2006 Genetics 172:663-686). This approach tracks blocks of DNA known ashaplotypes, as defined by polymorphic markers, which are assumed to beidentical by descent in the mapping population. This assumption resultsin a larger effective sample size, offering greater resolution of QTL.Methods for determining the statistical significance of a correlationbetween a phenotype and a genotype, in this case a haplotype, may bedetermined by any statistical test known in the art and with anyaccepted threshold of statistical significance being required. Theapplication of particular methods and thresholds of significance arewell within the skill of the ordinary practitioner of the art.

It is further understood, that the present invention provides bacterial,viral, microbial, insect, mammalian and plant cells comprising thenucleic acid molecules of the present invention.

As used herein, a “nucleic acid molecule,” be it a naturally occurringmolecule or otherwise may be “substantially purified”, if desired,referring to a molecule separated from substantially all other moleculesnormally associated with it in its native state. More preferably asubstantially purified molecule is the predominant species present in apreparation. A substantially purified molecule may be greater than 60%free, preferably 75% free, more preferably 90% free, and most preferably95% free from the other molecules (exclusive of solvent) present in thenatural mixture. The term “substantially purified” is not intended toencompass molecules present in their native state.

The agents of the present invention will preferably be “biologicallyactive” with respect to either a structural attribute, such as thecapacity of a nucleic acid to hybridize to another nucleic acidmolecule, or the ability of a protein to be bound by an antibody (or tocompete with another molecule for such binding). Alternatively, such anattribute may be catalytic, and thus involve the capacity of the agentto mediate a chemical reaction or response.

The agents of the present invention may also be recombinant. As usedherein, the term recombinant means any agent (e.g. DNA, peptide etc.),that is, or results, however indirect, from human manipulation of anucleic acid molecule.

The agents of the present invention may be labeled with reagents thatfacilitate detection of the agent (e.g. fluorescent labels (Prober etal., 1987 Science 238:336-340; Albarella et al., European Patent144914), chemical labels (Sheldon et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,582,789;Albarella et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,563,417), modified bases (Miyoshi etal., European Patent 119448).

Having now generally described the invention, the same will be morereadily understood through reference to the following examples which areprovided by way of illustration, and are not intended to be limiting ofthe present invention, unless specified.

EXAMPLES

Having illustrated and described the principles of the presentinvention, it should be apparent to persons skilled in the art that theinvention can be modified in arrangement and detail without departingfrom such principles. We claim all modifications that are within thespirit and scope of the appended claims.

Example 1 Inoculation and Phenotyping for Diplodia Ear Rot (DER)

Corn plant reaction to DER inoculation at various geographies wasassessed and QTL and SNP markers associated with DER resistance werefound by the following means. In order to assess reaction to DER, plantsare artificially inoculated with either a mixture containingStenocarpella maydis and Stenocarpella macrospora isolate or theisolates of either pathogen. Plants are inoculated by methods ofdeposition of a suspension of spores on the grain stalk, placinginoculum in the apical whorl of the plants according to Flett andMcLaren (1994) and Bensch (1995) or inoculated according to Chambers(1988), Klapproth and Hawk (1991), and Villena (1969).

Resistance and susceptibility to DER can be determined by examination ofears or shelled grain.

Percentage of rotten ears is calculated after the ears are harvested atan average moisture of 18% to 21%. Ears are visually examined forsymptoms of DER. Infected ears are expressed as a percentage of thetotal number of ears harvested in each plot.

Percentage of rotten grain is calculated after hand harvesting andshelling of the ears. Total grain weight and rotten grain weight aredetermined and percentage of rotten grain is used as phenotypic data.Herein, up to 8% rotten grain is considered resistant, 8-20% rottengrain is considered mid-resistant or tolerant, and greater than 20%rotten grain is considered susceptible.

Example 2 Mapping Population 2 (CV183/CV174+01HG14) for DER usingStenocarpella maydis

DER is a widespread ear rot pathogen of corn which is presented in manycountries. To identify QTL and SNP markers associated with DERresistance, reaction of inoculated corn plants was assessed inArgentina, USA, and South Africa. In the present invention QTL and SNPmarkers associated with DER resistance were identified by the followingmeans. A mapping population was developed for identifying corn genomicregions associated with DER. A mapping population of 146 individualsfrom F_(2:3) families was developed from the CV183/CV174 population.Trials were conducted across three geographies. Trials were evaluated atthree locations in Argentina (1 replication per location), two locationsin the USA (2 replications per location), and at four locations in SouthAfrica (2 replications per location). Plants were artificiallyinoculated with Stenocarpella maydis, and DER incidence data werecollected. Phenotypic DER incidence was calculated as percentage ofinfected ears within a plot. Genomic DNA was isolated from the F_(2:3)families and screened with 123 SNP markers. After quality controlanalysis, 115 markers were chosen for the mapping study. QTL mapping wasperformed with Windows QTL Cartographer Version 2.5 using CompositeInterval Mapping (CIM) with a forward regression method. MultipleInterval Mapping (MIM) was used to further refine the QTL mapping usinga forward regression selection method on markers. Criteria for the modelselection were set at a probability of partial R² at a significancelevel of 0.01. MIM was performed for each geography, pairwisecombination, combinations of the geographies, and combined across allgeographies by estimating the QTL effects, optimizing the QTL positions,and searching for new QTLs via Main QTLs and QTL interactions. FIG. 1provides the QTL with flanking SNP markers found to be associated withDER. The QTL and SNP markers provided in the present invention can beused to introgress resistance to DER into corn plants.

Example 3 Mapping Population 3 (CV128/CV162) for DER Using a Mixture ofStenocarpella macrospora and Stenocarpella maydis

DER is a widespread ear rot pathogen of corn which is presented in manycountries. To identify QTL and SNP markers associated with DERresistance, reaction of inoculated corn plants was assessed in centralBrazil. Of the two DER pathogens in Brazil, S. macrospora is moreprominent in the central region and S. maydis is more prominent in thesouth. In the present invention, QTL and SNP markers associated with DERresistance were identified by the following means. A mapping populationwas developed for identifying corn genomic regions associated with DERresistance. In the mapping population, 769 F₂ progenies were developedfrom the cross CV128/CV162. The field trial was conducted in centralBrazil in a complete randomized block design with three replications.Plants were artificially inoculated twice with a mixture ofStenocarpella macrospora and Stenocarpella maydis by deposition offungal spores at the insertion of the shank with the stalk. PhenotypicDER incidence was calculated as percentage of rotten grain from totalgrain. Genomic DNA was screened with 117 SNP markers. Single markeranalysis was performed by simple linear regression. A multipleregression model with all significant markers was performed, and themodel was further refined with a stepwise procedure with a 0.15significance level for one marker entry and 0.10 significance level toremain in the model. FIG. 2 provides QTL and SNP markers associated withDER resistance from this mapping study.

Example 4 Mapping Population (CV128*2/CV162) for DER Using Stenocarpellamacrospora and Stenocarpella maydis

DER is a widespread ear rot pathogen of corn which is presented in manycountries. To identify QTL and SNP markers associated with DERresistance, reaction of inoculated corn plants was assessed in CentralBrazil. In the present invention, QTL and SNP markers associated withDER resistance were validated by the following means. A population of260 BC1F3 individuals was developed from the cross CV128*2/CV162. Thestudy was conducted in central Brazil in a complete randomized blockdesign with four replications. Two replications were artificiallyinoculated with Stenocarpella maydis, and two were artificiallyinoculated with Stenocarpella macrospora. Three inoculations were madeby deposition of fungal spores at the insertion of the shank with thestalk. Phenotypic DER incidence was calculated as percentage of rottengrain from total grain. Genomic DNA was screened with a total of 170 SNPmarkers. QTL and SNP markers found to be associated with DER resistancefrom Stenocarpella macrospora are provided in FIG. 3. QTL and SNPmarkers found to be associated with DER resistance from Stenocarpellamaydis are provided in FIG. 4. QTL associated with resistance to DERfrom S. macrospora were identified on Chromosomes 4 and 7. On Chromosome4, a QTL was identified that was associated with resistance to DER fromS. maydis.

Example 5 Mapping Population (CV162/CV129+CV128) Using Stenocarpellamaydis and Stenocarpella macrospora in Central Brazil

DER is a widespread ear rot pathogen of corn which is presented in manycountries. To identify QTL and SNP markers associated with DERresistance, reaction of inoculated corn plants was assessed in CentralBrazil. In the present invention, QTL and SNP markers associated withDER resistance were identified by the following means. A mappingpopulation was developed for identifying corn genomic regions associatedwith DER resistance. In the mapping population, 140 doubled haploids(DH) progenies were developed from crossing two inbred lines, CV162 andCV129.

Each DH progeny was test-crossed to the susceptible tester CV128 and theresulting hybrids were evaluated at three different locations within theCentral region of Brazil with two replications per site, during thesummer season of 2005-2006. After flowering time, all ears wereartificially inoculated with a mixture of Stenocarpella maydis,Stenocarpella macrospora and Fusarium moniliforme. This mixture has beenwidely used by the breeding program in Brazil to screen for a diseasecomplex known as Grãos Ardidos. Harvest of yield trials was performed byhand and phenotypic DER incidence was calculated as percentage of rottenears.

Genomic DNA was isolated from every DH progeny and screened with 106 SNPmarkers. QTL mapping was performed with QTL cartographer Version 2.5from North Caroline State University, using Composite interval mapping(CIM) with a forward regression method and cross type set to Ri0(Recombinant inbred line, derived by doubled haploid lines). Data forthis Example is shown in FIG. 5.

Regions on chromosomes three and five exhibited consistency acrosslocations and years when compared with the results given in Example 6.

Example 6 DER Mapping Population (CV162/CV129+CV128) using Stenocarpellamaydis and Stenocarpella macrospora in Central and Southern Brazil

DER is a widespread ear rot pathogen of corn which is presented in manycountries. To identify QTL and SNP markers associated with DERresistance, reaction of inoculated corn plants was assessed in Centraland Southern Brazil. In the present invention, QTL and SNP markersassociated with DER resistance were identified by the following means. Amapping population was developed for identifying corn genomic regionsassociated with DER resistance. In the mapping population, 144 doubledhaploids (DH) progenies were developed from crossing two inbred lines,CV162 and CV129. During 2006-2007, plants were grown in southern andcentral Brazil at three different locations in each geography. Plantswere artificially inoculated with a mixture of Stenocarpella maydis andStenocarpella macrospora by depositing a suspension of spores on theplant. Genomic DNA was screened with 107 SNP markers. Percentage ofrotten ears was used as phenotypic data in the mapping analysis. FIG. 6provides QTL and flanking SNP markers associated with DER resistance.The QTL and SNP markers provided can be used for introgressing DERresistance into corn plants.

Example 7 Exemplary Marker Assays for Detecting DER Resistance

In one embodiment, the detection of polymorphic sites in a sample ofDNA, RNA, or cDNA may be facilitated through the use of nucleic acidamplification methods. Such methods specifically increase theconcentration of polynucleotides that span the polymorphic site, orinclude that site and sequences located either distal or proximal to it.Such amplified molecules can be readily detected by gel electrophoresis,fluorescence detection methods, or other means. Exemplary primers andprobes for amplifying and detecting genomic regions associated with DERresistance are given in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Exemplary assays for detecting DER resistance. SEQ Marker ID SEQID SEQ SNP Forward Reverse SEQ ID SEQ ID Marker ID Position PrimerPrimer Probe 1 Probe 2 NC0003210 27 129 48 49 56 57 NC0106527 28 356 5051 58 59 NC0015344 5 420 52 53 60 61 NC0016137 6 482 54 55 62 63

Example 8 Oligonucleotide Hybridization Probes Useful for Detecting CornPlants with DER Resistance Loci

Oligonucleotides can also be used to detect or type the polymorphismsassociated with DER resistance disclosed herein by hybridization-basedSNP detection methods. Oligonucleotides capable of hybridizing toisolated nucleic acid sequences which include the polymorphism areprovided. It is within the skill of the art to design assays withexperimentally determined stringency to discriminate between the allelicstates of the polymorphisms presented herein. Exemplary assays includeSouthern blots, Northern blots, microarrays, in situ hybridization, andother methods of polymorphism detection based on hybridization.Exemplary oligonucleotides for use in hybridization-based SNP detectionare provided in Table 2. These oligonucleotides can be detectablylabeled with radioactive labels, fluorophores, or other chemiluminescentmeans to facilitate detection of hybridization to samples of genomic oramplified nucleic acids derived from one or more corn plants usingmethods known in the art.

TABLE 2  Oligonucleotide Hybridization Probes Marker SNP HybridizationSEQ ID Marker SEQ ID Position Probe Probe NC0003210 27 129 TTTTTGT CTCAAAGTA 64 NC0003210 27 129 TTTTTGT G TCAAAGTA 65 NC0106527 28 356ACCATAC G GACCCACT 66 NC0106527 28 356 ACCATAC C GACCCACT 67 NC0015344 5420 GGAGGCA G TTCTTTTG 68 NC0015344 5 420 GGAGGCA A TTCTTTTG 69NC0016137 6 482 TGGGTGC T ACTGCTTC 70 NC0016137 6 482 TGGGTGC C ACTGCTTC71 *SNPs in bold print and underlined

Example 9 Oligonucleotide Probes Useful for Detecting Corn Plants withDER Resistance Loci by Single Base Extension Methods

Oligonucleotides can also be used to detect or type the polymorphismsassociated with DER resistance disclosed herein by single base extension(SBE)-based SNP detection methods. Exemplary oligonucleotides for use inSBE-based SNP detection are provided in Table 9. SBE methods are basedon extension of a nucleotide primer that is hybridized to sequencesadjacent to a polymorphism to incorporate a detectable nucleotideresidue upon extension of the primer. It is also anticipated that theSBE method can use three synthetic oligonucleotides. Two of theoligonucleotides serve as PCR primers and are complementary to thesequence of the locus which flanks a region containing the polymorphismto be assayed. Exemplary PCR primers that can be used to typepolymorphisms disclosed in this invention are provided in Table 3 in thecolumns labeled “Forward Primer SEQ ID” and “Reverse Primer SEQ ID”.Following amplification of the region containing the polymorphism, thePCR product is hybridized with an extension primer which anneals to theamplified DNA adjacent to the polymorphism. DNA polymerase and twodifferentially labeled dideoxynucleoside triphosphates are thenprovided. If the polymorphism is present on the template, one of thelabeled dideoxynucleoside triphosphates can be added to the primer in asingle base chain extension. The allele present is then inferred bydetermining which of the two differential labels was added to theextension primer. Homozygous samples will result in only one of the twolabeled bases being incorporated and thus only one of the two labelswill be detected. Heterozygous samples have both alleles present, andwill thus direct incorporation of both labels (into different moleculesof the extension primer) and thus both labels will be detected.

TABLE 3  Probes (extension primers) for Single BaseExtension (SBE) assays. Probe Marker SNP SEQ Marker SEQ ID PositionProbe (SBE) ID NC0003210 27 129 TAAAACCTTTTTTTGTC 72 NC0003210 27 129CTGAGGCAATACTTTGA 73 NC0106527 28 356 TGGCAACAAACCATACG 74 NC0106527 28356 TGAAGAATAAGTGGGTC 75 NC0015344 5 420 AAAATGTTGGGAGGCAG 76 NC00153445 420 AATGGGCAGCAAAAGAA 77 NC0016137 6 482 CCAGCTGCGTGGGTGCT 78NC0016137 6 482 TCTCTATCAGAAGCAGT 79

Example 10 Introgression of DER Resistance into a Corn Plant

Corn breeders can use the SNP markers provided in the present inventionto introgress DER resistance into a corn plant. The markers provided inTable 4 can be used to monitor the introgression of DER resistance QTLinto a corn plant. In addition, Table 4 includes exemplary sources ofDER resistance.

The introgression of one or more resistance loci is achieved via one ormore cycles of backcrossing to a recurrent parent with one or morepreferred agronomic characteristics, accompanied by selection to retainthe one or more DER resistance loci from the donor parent using themarkers of the present invention. Introgression can be monitored bygenotyping one or more plants and determining the allelic state of theone or more DER resistance loci. This backcross procedure is implementedat any stage in variety development and occurs in conjunction withbreeding for one or more traits of interest including transgenic andnontransgenic traits.

Alternatively, a forward breeding approach is employed wherein one ormore DER resistance loci can be monitored for successful introgressionfollowing a cross with a susceptible parent with subsequent generationsgenotyped for one or more DER resistance loci and for one or moreadditional traits of interest, including transgenic and nontransgenictraits.

TABLE 4 Summary of SNP markers associated with DER resistance and exemplarysources of DER resistance for each allele. DER res. SEQ ID Susc.Resistant SNP Marker Chrom Pos Locus marker Res. Allele Allele SourcePosition NC0009449 1 82.0 1 1 AA GG CV174 188 NC0025863 1 96.7 1 2 AA GGCV174 129 NC0199970 1 191.6 2 3 TT CC CV129 386 NC0039486 1 207.9 2 4 AACC CV129 206 NC0015344 1 221.1 3 5 GG AA CV162 420 NC0016137 1 256.3 3 6CC TT CV162 482 NC0106389 3 14.2 4 7 GG AA CV162 222 NC0199309 3 83.2 58 AA GG CV162 303 NC0009470 3 88.0 4 9 GG CC CV162 137 NC0199941 3 99.25 10 AA GG CV162 101 NC0030587 3 179.7 6 11 AA CC CV183  84 NC0019414 3204.2 6 12 AA CC CV183 275 NC0009057 4 21.7 7 13 TT GG CV162 229NC0199875 4 46.8 7 14 TT GG CV162 125 NC0201962 4 71.0 8 15 TT GG CV162244 NC0105550 4 94.8 8 16 ************* CCTACCT CV162 241-253 TCAGAANC0032557 4 95.1 9 17 CC GG CV174 413 NC0105197 4 99.9 10 18 CC TT CV129321 NC0009620 4 109.2 9 19 TT GG CV174 175 NC0200096 4 120.8 10 20 GG TTCV129 165 NC0009668 5 65.2 11 21 GG AA CV129   1 NC0111346 5 79.0 12 22AA CC CV162 366 NC0200395 5 81.3 11 23 GG CC CV129 163 NC0040366 5 84.112 24 AA CC CV162 119 NC0202210 5 107.8 13 25 TT CC CV129 321 NC02001065 124.2 13 26 CC TT CV129 241 NC0003210 6 38.4 14 27 CC GG CV183 129NC0106527 6 56.4 14 28 CC GG CV183 356 NC0008833 6 70.9 15 29 CC AACV162 179 NC0004030 6 85.5 16 30 GG AA CV162 312 NC0201579 6 88.0 15 31AA GG CV162  91 NC0088767 6 99.0 16 32 CC AA CV162 536 NC0202487 6 103.017 33 CC AA CV162 377 NC0199561 6 118.1 17 34 TT AA CV162 728 NC02019427 34.5 18 35 CC TT CV129 271 NC0013158 7 48.6 19 36 GG TT CV162 382NC0009409 7 51.2 18 37 CC TT CV129 294 NC0040322 7 64.5 20 38 AA CCCV162  41 NC0029362 7 78.4 19 39 TT CC CV162 106 NC0029362 7 78.4 20 39TT CC CV162 106 NC0082612 8 78.9 21 40 AA GG CV174 309 NC0013946 8 84.021 41 GG AA CV174  59 NC0200572 8 95.6 22 42 GG TT CV162 270 NC0031630 8125.1 22 43 CC TT CV162 645 NC0104512 10 57.3 23 44 TT AA CV129  79NC0201713 10 71.7 23 45 CC TT CV129 145 NC0009486 10 105.5 24 46 TT AACV183 166 NC0008643 10 119.1 24 47 GG AA CV183 241

In view of the foregoing, it will be seen that the several advantages ofthe invention are achieved and attained.

The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain theprinciples of the invention and its practical application to therebyenable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention invarious embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to theparticular use contemplated.

Various patent and non-patent publications are cited herein, thedisclosures of each of which are, to the extent necessary, incorporatedherein by reference in their entireties.

As various modifications could be made in the constructions and methodsherein described and illustrated without departing from the scope of theinvention, it is intended that all matter contained in the foregoingdescription or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpretedas illustrative rather than limiting. The breadth and scope of thepresent invention should not be limited by any of the above-describedexemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with thefollowing claims appended hereto and their equivalents.

We claim:
 1. A method of identifying a corn plant comprising at leastone allele associated with diplodia ear rot (DER) resistance or with DERtolerance in a corn plant comprising: (a) genotyping at least one cornplant with at least one corn genomic nucleic acid marker selected fromthe group of SEQ ID NOs: 1-46, and 47, and (b) selecting at least onecorn plant comprising an allele of at least one of said nucleic acidmarkers that is associated with resistance or tolerance to DER.
 2. Themethod according to claim 1, wherein the at least one corn plantgenotyped in step (a) and/or the at least one corn plant selected instep (b) is a corn plant from a population generated by a cross.
 3. Themethod according to claim 1, wherein said genotyping in step (b) is withat least five corn genomic nucleic acid markers are selected from thegroup of SEQ ID NOs: 1 through
 47. 4. The method according to claim 1,wherein the selected one or more corn plants exhibit at least toleranceto a DER-inducing fungus or exhibit at least resistance to aDER-inducing fungus.
 5. The method according to claim 2, wherein saidpopulation is generated by a cross of at least one DER resistant cornplant with at least one DER sensitive corn plant.
 6. The methodaccording to claim 1, further comprising the step (c) of assaying theselected corn plant for resistance to a DER-inducing fungus.
 7. Themethod of claim 1, further comprising the step of crossing the cornplant selected in step (b) to another corn plant.
 8. The method of claim1, further comprising the step of obtaining seed from the corn plantselected in step (b).
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein resistance ortolerance is to a DER-inducing fungus selected from the group consistingof Stenocarpella maydis and Stenocarpella macrospora.
 10. A method ofintrogressing a diplodia ear rot (DER) resistance locus into a cornplant comprising: (a) screening a population with at least one nucleicacid marker to determine if one or more corn plants from the populationcontains a diplodia ear rot (DER) resistance locus, wherein the DERresistance locus is selected from the group consisting of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, or24 DER resistant loci, and (b) selecting from said population at leastone corn plant comprising an allele of said marker associated with saidDER resistance locus.
 11. The method according to claim 10, wherein atleast one of the markers is as provided in FIG. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, orTable
 4. 12. The method according to claim 10, wherein at least one ofthe markers is located within 5 cM of the resistant allele.
 13. Themethod according to claim 12, wherein said population is a segregatingpopulation.
 14. The method according to claim 10, wherein at least oneof the markers is located within 100 Kb of the resistance allele. 15.The method according to claim 10, wherein at least one of the markersexhibits a LOD score of greater than 2.0 with said DER resistance locus.16. The method according to claim 10, wherein at least one of themarkers is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1-46, and 47.17. A corn plant obtained by the method of claim 1, wherein said cornplant comprises an allele of at least one nucleic acid molecule selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1 through 47 that is associatedwith resistance or tolerance to DER, and wherein said corn plantexhibits at least tolerance to a DER-inducing fungus or at leastresistance to a DER-inducing fungus.
 18. A corn plant obtained by themethod of claim
 10. 19. The corn plant according to claim 18, whereinsaid corn plant comprises an allele of at least one of nucleic acidmarker selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1-46, and 47 thatis associated with resistance to DER or with tolerance to DER.
 20. Thecorn plant of claim 18, wherein the corn plant exhibits at leasttolerance to a DER-inducing fungus.
 21. The corn plant of claim 18,wherein the corn plant exhibits at least resistance to a DER-inducingfungus.
 22. The corn plant of claim 20, wherein the DER-inducing fungusis selected from the group consisting of Stenocarpella macrospora andStenocapella maydis.
 23. The corn plant of claim 21, wherein theDER-inducing fungus is selected from the group consisting ofStenocarpella macrospora and Stenocapella maydis.
 24. An isolatednucleic acid molecule for detecting a molecular marker representing apolymorphism in corn DNA, wherein the nucleic acid molecule comprises atleast 15 nucleotides that include or are adjacent to the polymorphism,wherein the nucleic acid molecule is at least 90 percent identical to asequence of the same number of consecutive nucleotides in either strandof DNA that include or are adjacent to the polymorphism, and wherein themolecular marker is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1through
 47. 25. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 24, wherein thenucleic acid further comprises a detectable label or provides forincorporation of a detectable label.
 26. The isolated nucleic acid ofclaim 24, wherein the nucleic acid molecule hybridizes to at least oneallele of the molecular marker under stringent hybridization conditions.27. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 24, wherein the molecular markeris SEQ ID NO: 27 and wherein the isolated nucleic acid is anoligonucleotide that is at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 56, 57,64, 65, 72, or
 73. 28. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 24, whereinthe molecular marker is SEQ ID NO: 28 and the nucleic acid is anoligonucleotide that is at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 58, 59,66, 67, 74, or
 75. 29. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 24, whereinthe molecular marker is SEQ ID NO: 5 and the nucleic acid is anoligonucleotide that is at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 60, 61,68, 69, 76, or
 77. 30. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 24, whereinthe molecular marker is SEQ ID NO: 6 and the nucleic acid is anoligonucleotide that is at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 62, 63,70, 71, 78, or 79.